Publish in Perspectives - Wednesday, July 10, 2013
Uruguayan capital Montevideo. While risks, principally regional in nature still linger, there is broad domestic consensus as to the proper policies that need to be implemented. (Photo: Uruguay Economy Ministry)
Uruguayan President Jorge Mujica and Vice President Danilo Astori. The government has built a sizable financial shield to protect its fiscal standing and the local economy at large from unexpected external shocks. (Photo: Uruguay President's Office)
Despite slowdown, Uruguay's prospects remain sound.
BY FRANCO
UCCELLI
Real
GDP growth is converging toward potential. While the government has recently affirmed
its 4.0 percent real GDP growth forecast for 2013, which would represent a
slight improvement over last year’s 3.9 percent expansion, data for 1Q13
already shows growth slowing to 3.7 percent, driven by a moderation in
consumption, down from 4.4 percent in 1Q12. The central bank (BCU) estimates
growth potential at 3.0 percent, lower than trend growth of 4.0 percent, and
forecasts real GDP to expand 3.2 percent in 2013, still a healthy level if one
considers that population growth in Uruguay is virtually non-existent, which
means that any growth in the economy, even if it is moderate, will yield growth
in per capita income. Interestingly, high-ranking officials have recently
indicated that Uruguay is not prepared to sacrifice economic growth for the
sake of reducing inflation to unrealistically low levels.
Recent
measures should help ease inflationary pressures. The BCU is hoping that the
monetary policy measures that went into effect on July 1 will ease inflationary
pressures and lower inflation expectations. Those measures include a shift from
rates management to monetary aggregates management as the key policy anchor and
the widening of the inflation target range to 3-7 percent from 4-6 percent
starting in July 2014. Nevertheless, the authorities have made it clear that
the imposition of the new measures should not be viewed as tacit recognition
that the inflation-containment policy based on rates management did not work,
but rather as an attempt to eliminate the perverse disincentive to the
development of an overnight interbank loan market that resulted from the “free
lunch” situation that local banks were enjoying, in which they opted to lend
their excess liquidity to the BCU at attractive rates (9.25 percent at last
count), rather than to each other, thus hindering the development of an
interbank loan market. Moreover, the monetary authorities believe that no
monetary policy alone is enough to contain inflationary pressures if it is not
accompanied by prudent fiscal and income (wage) policies. After closing 2012 at
7.5 percent, inflation is officially projected to inch up to 7.9 percent in
2013, before moderating to 6.4 percent in 2014 (falling within the new target
range) and 5.3 percent in 2015.
There
is no consensus on the FX path. Following the peso’s sharp 8.5 percent
depreciation since late May, there appears to be no consensus among local
agents regarding the path the Uruguayan peso (UYU) is likely to follow going
forward. Recall that the depreciation occurred when word got out that the BCU
was considering measures to curb massive capital inflows (they are estimated to
have totaled around US$1 billion in 1H13) that were attracted to public
securities paying hefty interest rates and had put undue appreciation pressure
on the local currency. While some local pundits believe the UYU is poised to
appreciate from current levels of around 20.60 per US$ as capital inflows in
the form of foreign direct investment (FDI) continue in full force, others
believe the UYU is likely to weaken further, dragged by less-supportive
international conditions, such as the strengthening of the US$ and financial
outflows from emerging markets. While we believe the recent repricing has
resulted in a new floor of 20 per US$ for the UYU and that the exchange rate
will probably close 2013 around 20.85 per US$ (lower than the 22 recently
projected by the government), we recognize that UYU performance will probably
be largely driven by the behavior of the Brazilian real (BRL), as the high
correlation between the two currencies, which had diminished of late, has been
recently restored.
Fiscal
deficit is likely to stay north of 2 percent of GDP through 2015. The government has raised
its fiscal deficit forecast for 2013 to 2.1 percent of GDP from 1.4 percent
previously, bringing it more in line with market expectations. While most
locals view the revised forecast as more realistic, with virtually no one
believing the government could slash the deficit in half this year from 2.8
percent of GDP in 2012, particularly as the country enters a new electoral
cycle, many (including us) believe the new 2.1 percent of GDP official deficit
forecast is still a bit too optimistic. The government calls for the deficit to
widen to 2.4 percent of GDP in 2014, as the presidential race heats up (it is
scheduled for October of next year), taking it to the level where we actually
see it closing this year. The government expects the shortfall to decline to
2.0 percent of GDP, up from a previous 1.0 percent estimate, in 2015, once the
election is over. Most people believe the current Mujica administration will do
just enough not to be blamed for boosting inflation by pursuing a lax fiscal
policy, but will do little to lower inflationary pressures by pursuing a tight
fiscal policy in the middle of the electoral cycle.
Government’s
financial shield remains substantial. The government has built a sizable financial
shield to protect its fiscal standing and the local economy at large from
unexpected external shocks. To that end, it has negotiated contingent credit
lines (CCL) for almost US$2 billion (4 percent of GDP) from four international
financial institutions, including the CAF, FLAR, IDB, and World Bank. These
CCL, along with cash reserves totaling some US$1.8 billion (enough to cover
roughly two years worth of public debt amortizations), have enabled the
government not only to protect itself from unexpected financial shocks, but
also to set up more cost-efficient funding strategies. In fact, the government
is now relying more heavily on CCL than on cash reserves (which used to total
around US$3 billion one year ago) as a hedging mechanism, since the negative
carry cost of maintaining cash reserves is higher than the maintenance fees (if
any) attached to the CCL. The purpose of the CCL, and of the cash reserves for
that matter, is to provide a precautionary line of defense for Uruguay, which
is not at great risk of an external payments crisis of its own making, but
could be vulnerable to contagion effects from capital account crises arising in
other countries.
Composition
of public debt continues to improve. Another way in which Uruguay has made great
progress reducing its financial vulnerabilities has been by improving the
currency composition of its public debt. The government has raised the
percentage of public debt denominated in local currency to 59 percent currently
(10 percent in nominal UYU and 49 percent UI inflation-linkers) from only 15
percent in 2006. The initial goal of the current administration was to lift the
percentage of local currency-denominated debt to 45 percent by 2014. The fact
that the target has not only been met, but has been significantly exceeded
ahead of schedule, means that the government now has ample scope to take
advantage of favorable funding opportunities, regardless of the currency in
question. Accordingly, the government has indicated that it is keeping its
options open. All this is solid proof that the government’s de-dollarization
strategy, which does not seek to eliminate foreign-currency debt altogether but
rather to reduce any mismatches between its assets and liabilities, is paying
handsome dividends.
US$
debt looks more appealing than before. Following the imposition of capital controls
in the form of marginal reserve requirements on foreign investments in both BCU
and government local currency-denominated debt instruments, many observers
believe foreign-currency bonds are looking more attractive, particularly now
that Uruguay’s US$ global bonds have underperformed the broad EM market in the
recent sell-off, rendering them cheaper than before. While risks, principally
regional in nature (Brazil, Argentina), still linger, there is broad domestic
consensus as to the proper policies that need to be implemented to reduce the
country’s external vulnerabilities, not to mention its massive financial shield
to confront any potential external headwinds. Against this background, and
perhaps bolstering the case to take a closer look at Uruguay’s foreign
currency-denominated debt, is some evidence that key local investors are
planning to increase their holdings of US$ debt. At a minimum, they argue, it
is worth the look, and we agree.
Franco Uccelli is an analyst with JP Morgan Chase. This column is based on a recent trip report. Republished with permission.