Publish in Perspectives - Tuesday, May 14, 2013
Colombia's resource extraction boom and household consumption have helped offset weak agriculture and manufacturing sectors. (Photo: Colombia's Mining and Energy Ministry)
Will Colombia's plan to spur the economy be effective?
BY LATIN AMERICA ADVISOR
Inter-American Dialogue
Colombia's
government on April 15 unveiled a $2.74 billion stimulus package that is
intended to boost the economy and cool the appreciation of the peso. New
measures will also encourage private pension funds to invest more money abroad,
among other steps, said Finance Minister Mauricio Cárdenas. What factors have
led to the peso's appreciation and slower economic growth in Colombia? Will the
government's plan be effective? What sectors of Colombia's economy are doing
well, and which are hurting the most?
Ben
Ramsey, executive director for Latin America Research at J.P. Morgan in New
York: Colombia's
economy moved from an above-trend 6.6 percent pace of GDP growth in 2011 to
slightly below-trend 4.0 percent growth in 2012 (the authorities estimate
potential GDP growth between 4.5 and 4.8 percent). The data suggest the third
quarter of last year was already the low point for activity, with
fourth-quarter GDP and first-quarter indicators pointing to a gradual, if still
somewhat choppy, recovery path. Colombia's economy has been characterized on
the positive side by strong demand from household consumption and a natural
resource extraction boom, drivers which have contrasted with mediocre
performance from the agriculture sector and an increasingly struggling
manufacturing sector. Amid these cross-currents, the wild card for overall
quarterly GDP results has come from rather volatile swings in public
infrastructure investment and construction. A stronger Colombian peso-itself a
function of higher commodity prices, ample global liquidity and a lower risk
premium on Colombian credit-has added to the drag on the lagging sectors, but
we do not think the peso's strength per se fully explains competitiveness
concerns. Nor do we think the indirect measure to increase U.S. dollar demand
from pension funds should provide much immediate relief. Nonetheless,
manufacturing and agriculture are politically sensitive, employment-generating
sectors, and the recently announced stimulus is clearly aimed at injecting them
with some life via higher and accelerated government investments, combined with
some fiscal alleviation and extension of credit. Overall, the measures were
well received, and they reduce the risk around our prevailing view that the
economy can return to trend-like growth by the second half of 2013. That said,
even prior to the package, we were expecting a marked increase in previously
delayed public investment, and execution capacity is a more important variable
than good intentions.
Erich
Arispe, director in the sovereign ratings group of Fitch Ratings: Colombia's growth slowed
down to 4 percent last year due to underperformance in construction (public
works and residential), manufacturing and agriculture. The deceleration
continued in the first quarter of this year as persistent weakness in
construction and manufacturing was accompanied by negative shocks to the mining
(coal) sector. Strong credibility and benign inflation dynamics have allowed
the central bank to provide policy stimulus (200 basis points of cuts since
last July) to boost domestic demand. Officials have also increased their
intervention in the foreign exchange market to avoid loss of competitiveness
and potential macroeconomic imbalances from a strong currency. Appreciating
pressures have moderated in 2013 due to lower domestic interest rates, changes
in the public sector external financing plans and relative deterioration in
global risk perceptions. In addition, the government recently introduced the
Productivity and Employment Impulse Plan (PIPE) to provide a boost to housing
and public works and increase demand for foreign exchange through
diversification of pension funds' assets. Fitch believes that Colombia is presently
undergoing a cyclical downturn and that growth could recover and approach the
economy's potential, averaging 4.5 percent in 2013-2014 as the mining sector
stabilizes and the policy stimulus filters through to credit, construction and
confidence. Nevertheless, a higher growth trajectory could be facilitated by
progress on the competitiveness-enhancing agenda. The country faces the
challenge of reducing labor costs and infrastructure gaps to support sectors
not directly related to mining and hydrocarbons. Transportation infrastructure
has been flagged as a key factor weighing on Colombia's competitiveness, growth
and diversification prospects.
Felipe
Carvallo, assistant vice president and analyst at the Financial Institutions
Group of Moody's de México: President Santos' stimulus plan includes measures for
easing the appreciation of the peso, which will aid Colombian exporters of raw
materials affected by lower prices on their products. The elimination of
specific tariffs, as well as the temporary elimination of electricity and gas
surtaxes, will ease cost pressures on small- and mid-sized enterprises.
However, most importantly, the stimulus plan includes commitments to
long-delayed infrastructure concessions, a further $388 million in infrastructure
investments and $927 million of subsidies for residential construction, all of
which will boost demand for corporate loans over the next two years. Despite
banks' expectations that commercial lending would drive growth in 2012, the
growth of the portfolio lagged at 11.5 percent, versus consumer loans which
grew 17.3 percent. Commercial lending was directly affected by delays in the
approval of the large-scale infrastructure concessions that were listed in the
announcement. We expect the banks with the largest commercial portfolios will
benefit from the boost in the construction sector, which accounted for 16.6
percent of total commercial loans as of year-end 2012. Banks focused on
middle-class mortgages will also benefit from increased mortgage demand related
to interest rate subsidies for middle-class residences worth $44,000-$109,000.
The 250-basis-point subsidy, which the government gives directly to borrowers
to incentivize them to shop for the lowest rate in the market, is substantial
when compared with the average mortgage rate for middle-class borrowers of 12.2
percent as of the last week of March.
Republished with permission from the Inter-American Dialogue's daily Latin America Advisor